Protestors 'frighten off' wind farm firm
December 2, 2003 23:14
WIND power supporters say they fear the company behind the plan to
build up to ten turbines on the edge of a Second World War airfield has been
frightened off by protestors.
Saxon Windpower of Ipswich is expected
later this week to announce its decision on whether to proceed with plans for a
£20 million wind farm at St James South Elmham, close to the former Metfield
airfield.
However, while supporters of the project remain hopeful, some
of them have expressed private fears that the bitter divisions the project has
caused among local communities will lead to the company pulling
out.
Landowner, Andrew Hadingham, was unavailable for comment yesterday
but it is known that he has been put under pressure to withdraw, while anti-wind
farm placards displayed on private property have been vandalised.
"Many
people have become afraid to express their opinion because those that already
have done have found themselves at loggerheads with neighbours and friends,"
said one of the project's supporters.
Saxon Windpower admitted three
weeks ago that it was "not comfortable" with the acrimony existing in St James
and nearby villages.
However, the company is aware that its competitors
are looking at the same area of Suffolk, claimed to be one of the best in the
region for wind farm potential.
Plans have already been announced for a
smaller wind farm at nearby Flixton and it seems certain that the area will
eventually figure in a form of energy development which is being encouraged by
the Government.
Energy Minister, Stephen Timms, announced earlier this
week that electricity suppliers would be required to purchase 15.4% of their
energy from renewable sources by the year 2015. The current target is 10.4% by
2010.
John Sanderson, spokesman for the pro wind power High Suffolk
Renewable Energy Co-operative, said he could see no reason why the St James
project should not go ahead.
"A certain amount of opposition has been
expressed locally but this is from a vociferous minority," he
said.
Experience elsewhere in the country had shown that wind farms posed
fewer problems in reality compared with the perception of some
locals.
"Wherever you put wind farms people have misgivings but there is
no real downside as far as I can see," he added.
Jane Bastow, spokeswoman
for Villagers Against Inappropriate Turbine Siting (VAITS) said the group
thought the withdrawal of the St James wind farm plan would be a "sensible
decision".
"If they do decide to apply for planning permission we will
fight it all the way.
"VAITS is serious in its intensions and its
objections are substantial. We are fully prepared to see this through," she
added.
Ms Bastow said that although opponents were being accused of being
a vocal minority the membership of VAITS was growing each day and now stood at
about 200.